Just How Important Is Emotion in Worship? by Dr. Howard Stevenson The quality of worship is often measured in some Christian groups and meetings on a purely emotional scale or graph; the higher it soars, the more significant the experience of worship is judged to have been. Make no mistake, authentic emotion constitutes a legitimate part of worship. It is, indeed, a vital ingredient in all of life's relationships; we cannot separate ourselves from being deeply touched and moved by important events of life. This is a part of what it means to be human. However, in many circles there seems be a tendency to make the emotional response the only criterion of "success" in worship. If we leave a time of worship with deep and strong emotional "tugs," we immediately say that we have truly been "in the heavenlies." Is this, however, the only evaluation of what it means to be a worshipper, or is the involvement in worship also based upon other parts of the human psyche --the mind, the conscience, the imagination, the will? Emotional identification in many of life's experiences comes as a "by-product" of the event and is not sought as the ultimate goal. We would not measure the quality of a football game or a concert or a close personal encounter with a friend by the extent of our emotional "trip." Perhaps the ingredient of true, authentic emotion required in worship cannot be measured as accurately as one would like. Is it possible that we can make sincere, factual, objective statements of God's worth, such as "Blessed be the name of the Lord," "God is great and greatly to be praised," and "Praise Jehovah" and be satisfied intellectually and rationally that we have truly worshipped? In many a worship service I have attended, either as a leader or as a member of the congregation, I have not been moved to tears --an emotional bath, as it were -- but I was still impressed with the fact that I had genuinely worshipped and given God the praise and adoration due to Him. Does false criteria based solely or exclusively on subjective emotional response sometimes rob us of the sense and satisfaction of having worshipped, even though we have given more than adequate expression of our love, adoration, and praise to God? A professor at a well-known seminary once remarked in my hearing that he was somewhat saddened by the fact that many of his graduate students in church music did not recognize they had in fact worshipped in their performance of a great choral masterpiece. They evidently did not feel that the music was any more than a work of choral art -- be it a Brahms "Requiem," a Handel "Messiah," a Rutter "Gloria," or a Wood "Service of Darkness." They either could not or did not make these masterpieces a vehicle of their worship, perhaps because singing them gave a stronger sense of objectivity, craft, and artfulness than did their singing of simpler, repetitive, almost monosyllabic, experience-oriented texts of praise choruses set to relatively elementary harmonic and melodic patterns. But surely worship can be expressed and identified just as effectively in the art forms and cultivated expressions of poetic text and verse, set to the beauties of polyphony or the richness of harmonic texture, as it can be in folk melodies and words. I sometimes think this is the response of many believers, too, when using the stronger, more poetic texts and music of the hymnal. Is the experience and assurance that we have been a worshipper reserved only for the times that we sing a lengthy sequence of praise choruses with their understandable simplicity, repetition, and folklike melodies? Or can our heritage of hymns, careful and dramatic reading of Scripture, periods of time for silent, thoughtful prayer speak perhaps of other facets of this celestial experience of worship? I am not implying any kind of elitism or false sophistication here but am pleading for the expansion of the scope of expressive worship possibilities. I would not for a moment wish to reduce or limit the joys of corporate worship but, instead, to move beyond the "formula" concept of worship that measures this spiritual encounter only by sheer emotion --however it is generated -- rather than by a mature evaluation of what has actually transpired both in the believer as well as by the believer. I appreciate the way in which Archbishop William Temple involves every facet of the human personality in his five-fold description of worship:
- the quickening of the conscience by the holiness of God
- the feeding of the mind by the truth of God
- the purging of the imagination by the beauty of God
- the opening of the heart to the love of God
- the devotion of the will to the purpose of God
|