This research paper by Jason Piland, submitted to Dr. James Anderson for ST5040 – Christian Encounter with Islam at Reformed Theological Seminary – Charlotte, analyzes the role of Sharia within the American legal framework and the proper Christian attitude toward it. Piland argues that fears of Sharia replacing U.S. law are unfounded and that understanding the true nature of Islamic jurisprudence is key to engaging Muslims with clarity and grace.
The study defines Sharia as both divine law and human interpretation (fiqh), emphasizing that its practical application is limited to voluntary religious or civil matters, such as marriage contracts and arbitration. Piland shows that American courts uphold constitutional boundaries while allowing for religious freedom under existing legal mechanisms, treating Islamic arbitration similarly to Jewish or Christian tribunals.
Finally, Piland calls Christians to avoid hostility and alarmism, instead responding with charity, discernment, and confidence in the gospel. He concludes that believers must defend religious liberty for all faiths, maintain integrity in civic engagement, and trust that social transformation comes through Christ rather than legislation.
Course and semester: ST5040 Christian Encounter with Islam — Spring 2017
